Posted by
Jon's Place on Thursday, August 02, 2007 8:09:08 PM
TNR has a funny sense of truth. Dean Barnett over at Hughhewitt.com http://hughhewitt.townhall.com/g/07095fb7-061f-4949-889a-59fd547d2153 provides a good translation of their non-confirmation confirmation, digging the hole deeper via non-verification verification of the story they ran over three weeks ago:
BAGHDAD DIARIST Shock Troops: http://www.tnr.com/doc.mhtml?i=w070730&s=editorial080207:
The gist of their confirmation goes something like this: Yes, I can verify that the Sun came up today, and as blue is a part of the color spectrum I can verify, though not blue, actually yellow, it is indeed a color. Therefore our story is confirmed. But as details are the color of context then we can fairly say unequivocally that TNR lied. Their writer lied.
Yes we did find bones--sounds familiar...
Clown: [throws up a shovelful of earth with a skull in it]
Hamlet: That skull had a tongue in it, and could sing once. How the knave jowls it to the ground, as if 'twere Cain's jaw-bone, that did the first murder! This might be the pate of a politician, which this asss now o'erraches, one that would circumvent God might it not?...
Clown:
"A pickaxe and a spade, a spade,
For and a shrouding sheet:
O, a pit of clay for to be made
For such a guest is meet."
Hamlet: There's another. Why may not that be a skull of a lawyer? where be his quiddities now, his quillities, his cases, his tenures, and his tricks? Why does he suffer this mad knave now to knock him about the sconce with a dirty shovel, and will not tell him of his action of battery? Hum! This fellow might be in 's time a great buyer of land, with his statues, his recognizances, his fines, his double vouchers, his recoveries. Is this the fine of his fines, and the recovery of his recoveries, to have his fine pate full of fine dirt? Will his vouchers vouch him no more his purchases, and doubles ones too, than the length and breadth of a pair of indentures? The very conveyances of his lands will scarcely lie in this box, and must th' inheritor himself have no more, ha?...
Clown: A pestilence on him for a mad rogue! a pur'd a flagon of Rhenish on my head once. This same skull, sir, was , sir Yorick's skull, the King's jester...
Hamlet: [Takes the skull]
Alas poor Yorick! I knew him, Horatio, a fellow of infinite jest, of most excellent fancy. He hath bore me on his back a thousand times, and now how abhorr'd in my imagination it is! my gorge rises at it. Hence hung those lips that I have kiss'd I know not how oft. Where be your gibes now, your gambols. your songs, your flashes of merriment, that were wont to set the table on a roar? Not one now to mock your own grinning--quite chop-fall'n. Now get you to my lady's chamber, and tell her, let her paint an inch thick, to this favor she must come, make her laugh at that. Prithee, Horatio, tell me one thing...
[puts down the skull]
I thought the skull episode sounded familiar. As for the rest, it smacks of "Heart of Darkness" which some know better as Apocalypse Now, or some such other Vietnam derangement syndrome movie.
As for the equivocation of TNR, they were not publishing a little piece of good fun that could be, well, more than truth like a Jim Murray (http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/1998/08/18/murray_update/) column. Nope, they were giving us, purportedly, facts as they laid out over time. And dare I say it--transparent motive--meaning none, but rather a simple accounting of what life is like for soldiers in Iraq.
And in this they not only failed, but willfully, lied. If not, their corroboration would have been a point-by-point rebuttal, but theirs rather resemble something more of the rump that Hamlet speaks of. A prattling pate without conscience or honor.