About Me

Name: Jon's Place
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Tid Bits, Questions and Answers and Whatever

Let me see if I can get this straight. We have a judge who can throw the book at Scooter Libby, and not to be outdone, we have a judge that can throw the book twice at Paris Hilton, but I can't find a judge anywhere that will throw the book at illegal aliens committing crimes?

Is this a great country or what:

Apparently the best way to avoid prosecution is to confess you don't belong here.

http://www.rockymountainnews.com/drmn/local/article/0,1299,DRMN_15_5559442,00.html

Wait, there's an update Gov. Ritter (D) Co. signs bill without comment. Is that like one-hand clapping? Gov. Ritter couldn't look? Oh, I see, mortgage fraud was the primary issue on his brain.

http://www.colorado.gov/governor/press/june07/48-bills-signed.html

Clinton judge proves fierce! Defender of illegal aliens? Does it always have to be so typical? Or to put another way how often are citizens ordered to coddle law breakers.

http://www.corruptionchronicles.com/2007/05/_clinton_judge_blocks_law_to_c.html

The story below seems to segue somehow into the Middle East, which makes McCain Kennedy 2.0 (is that like Window's 3.0 only dumber) all the more reassuring.

http://www.pegasusnews.com/news/2007/jan/13/judge-sentences-man-helping-illegal-aliens-get-fal/

Uh oh. From the spoke too soon file: Judge throws the book! What's that? Judge throws book, but not at illegal drug runner, but at the border patrol agents who shot a drug runner? How's that?

http://www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52545



 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

ah ha

Solutions to intractable nationwide problems:

Tort reform: make it a job Americans won't do--we can do this by paying illegals less than minimum wage. And Americans would have an increased fondness for regularization.

Private Pilot: If my plan can work for the above just think of the possibilities here. Carbon footprint made by Al Gore, Clinton (take your pick), Edwards, and like-minded sundry, would disappear. And then there's the added benefit of limiting exposure to hot-air pollution for most of the concerned nation.

Now I know what you're wondering, how does my plan work? Well, the way I figure it is if the jobs Americans won't do are due to below market wages, and because our education level as a nation is too high, and not as we are assured, because the wages are too low, then by taking this assessment at its word, we just make the above jobs available to illegal immigrants only and voila!

So continuing:

MSNBC reform: if we made being a news anchor at MSNBC a job no American would do, would that, oh, yea, that's already a job an American wouldn't do.

Okay, so the plan isn't perfect. But I'll keep at it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Memory of Civic Life

My first memory of civic life was in the small TV room at my grandparents. I still don’t exactly recall the year, I could look it up, but the black-and-white TV, a small room filled with four adults, and one child (me), is riveted by a funeral carriage pulled by six? eight? horses walking somberly along a wide street lined with so many, so quiet. I could see something was important, but I couldn’t know, but I could feel my parents, my grandparents. And that is my first civic memory.

The next was in the same room. The TV was color. The first I knew of. I was told that the President of the United Sates was talking. This time the room was six. My brother had been born, but then he was more interested in playing and eating, and the TV meant nothing to him. President Johnson was announcing he wasn’t going to run again. Again, I had no idea what I was watching, but understood that something important was happening.

My Grandmother was a life time Democrat. When we talked politics many years after her initial registration she mentioned that she hadn’t voted Democrat in years. I asked how many, she said, “I think since Truman, but I may be wrong.” I base her ambivalence on the simple fact that my Grandfather was less than not a fan of FDR. He used to talk about how FDR led us down the road to socialism. I remember at the time that I thought that was an odd sentiment, as everything I had heard was that FDR had saved us from the dreaded Depression, and the even more dreaded peril of Imperial Japan, and worse yet, Nazi Germany. My grandfather liked Hoover.

They were both salt of the earth. They were Hoosiers. Protestant, God loving, America loving souls, and this they gave to their children, and this they gave to me. Did they have faults? of course. But I can say this, I only once spoke consciously, insolently to my Grandfather, and it took all of an instant to regret forever that one moment. What was it about? Cleaning the windshield on my van. I said, “I could see with the dirt on it, no problem.” He said, “clean it, because you need to see clearly where you are going.” He had another saying I liked, still like. He said, “when you feel like you’re going too fast take your foot off the gas, let yourself fall back into the flow of traffic, let that flow carry you along for awhile, long enough until you feel like you’ve regained your bearings.”

And here we are in a culture that lionizes the young, begs to be young for ever, which seems to me like begging to be naive, ignorant, and bereft of any sense of wisdom. And why is this? Because FDR ripped our extended families apart. We were given social security. We encouraged a dislocation of our families, encouraged our different generations to look out for number one, spend your money on yourselves, don’t cultivate love, don’t cultivate loyalty, indulge your selfish inclination.

That is, fear not the Government will meet the needs of your progeny and your progeny’s progeny. Don’t worry, we are omnipotent, we know what’s best for you, for your children, for your children’s children.

“Don’t we tax you and all just to make these omnipotent decisions. Your wisdom is not. Your children’s wisdom is not. We promise to keep your children naive, ignorant, and puerile. We promise to extol nothing but the meaninglessness of life. To extol the most base, un-virtuous, vulgar understanding of life as engaged in indulgent flesh, that least denominator is the best that can be expressed. We shall do away with the nobility of soul that engages the virtuous and devout. All their truths will be drowned in the cacophony of kitsch, vulgar culture, all their attempts to arise will not be allowed to inspire any mass of any one.”

So, I cannot imagine being 3 or 4-years old in a small room with four adults watching a black-and-white TV, watching the solemn funeral walk of a fallen President. But that’s their truth, these mavens of culture, because the truth is I can imagine it. Because the truth is that all over this great land there are millions of us that would replicate that same ritual in a second, or didn’t you see that phenomenon of the American people when our American President passed away, President Reagan.

So the reality is not that the American soul has dissolved into some deconstructed post-modernist scam of human nature’s asserted miasma, bur rather that the whole of collectivist thought, deconstructionist thought, and all the isms meant to disjunction and dislocate the human experience has failed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

shadows and fences

Kennedy says (http://kennedy.senate.gov/newsroom/press_release.cfm?id=0094f736-f03d-41d0-b639-758fd0f47e49), that we need to bring "the twelve million men, women and children, hard working people out of the shadows [and] into the sunshine of America." So I went searching the shadows, and it's inconclusive,  
I'm not sure which shadows they're in.




So I was watching this http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=90SDkhwnEIo. And so I thought I would search for it myself. It is really really hard to find. But....

I think I spotted it. If you look really close you can spot it too.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Feinstein is tedious

Our good senator Dianne Feinstein goes out of her way to blame, you guessed it, talk radio for sinking a ship that can't sail: the illegal immigration bill, otherwise known as, the amnesty bill.

"Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., one of the bill's most enthusiastic supporters, blamed right-wing radio talk shows for the debacle." Well that is sweet of her.

http://washingtontimes.com/upi/20070608-020309-6882

But declining to play nice she decided to dig in with this statement: "I've never received more hate or more racist phone calls and threats."

On the one hand, I'm sure there are idiots out there who never tire of being idiots.

On the other though, I think most Americans, who happen to make up the majority of those opposed to the bill, do not care about this or that phenotype when it comes to people breaking and entering their house. I don't either.

That is I do not see how it follows if you object to someone breaking and entering, regardless of phenotype, that somehow you are then guilty of not liking this or that phenotype. I’m sorry but running around checking everyone’s phenotype requires more effort and time than I’ve got. And in any case I don't care.

Equally, I don't care where someone comes from as long as they enter legally. Someone wants to enter the country and apply for citizenship through the proper channels, well, more power to them. Great even! I like people who like freedom, liberty, the pursuit of life, liberty, and happiness. My kind of people. Oh, and I don't care about their phenotype. So there.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Mrs. J

It seems, I think, past time that I refer to my lovely wife as someone more personable than merely wife, but holding to the vague security of anonymity I require some nom de plum or such that will keep me from getting whopped on the head. And for this reason calling said lovely wife Mrs. Jon has more than a slight draw back, as I can feel the headache coming well before it arrives. So though not terribly creative, I have alighted on the splendidly simple and more artfully self preserving nom de Mrs. J. And I shall not further defend my choice than but to say I value my own good health.

Now this singular defense is now in itself in need of some singular defending or said whopping will be a coming. So rest assured that Mrs. J is not only lovely, but of a habit of good disposition for which I am eternally grateful, for surely before now if not so I would certainly be by any good phrenologist a singular and delightful puzzle.

Truth be told she is one of those souls who as a matter of inclination wakes up happy, by contrast, for instance, I am one of those souls who wakes up in a fit of fog, neither here nor there, which from time to time I’m accused by lovely Mrs. J of never having cleared from the whole day long . And to which, I must confess, I do not have an adequate defense, except to say that I have not yet had my coffee. Yet which is a weak defense when I am on cup number eight. Anyway, truthfully, that unless there is a very rare solar or lunar event, I can rest assured that I shall be greeted with a smile when the damn alarm clock rings. Her smile I love; the clock I hate.

It is as well to my good fortune that her sanguine sunshine in the morning does not by me come unappreciated. For by room mates and others, I have encountered those whose dispositions between the matins and 12 are at odds with peace and harmony. But as I am customarily in a fog, I am usually plenty tolerant, which in the habit of our age makes me nigh eligible for sainthood, to comment less than is equitable, I fear standards are falling.

We’ll, or at least I, shall now leave will enough alone by saying here’s to my lovely wife Mrs. J.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Anaheim Ducks: Stanley Cup Champions!!!

Yes, I am a day late--there was some doings going on yesterday that kind of grabbed my attention, but


Hooray!!!
We Are The Champions!!!!
Way to Win Ducks!!!!!

Congratulations to Rob and Scott Niedermayer, to Jean-Sebastien Giguere (great in goal), to Teemu Selanne, to Ryan Getzlaf, to Chris Pronger, Travis Moen and to all the Men that brought home the Stanley Cup.

Congratulations too to Coach Randy Carlyle who got to hold the great silver chalice for the first time in a career spanning the NHL ice for some thirty years or so. And too to Assistant coaches Dave Farrish, Newell Brown, and Francois Allaire.

Lets also salute and congratulate Team owners Henry and Susan Samueli, who along with the management team led by Michael Schulman, Tim Ryan, and Brian Burke put this GREAT TEAM together.

And last but not least, thanks to the
Anaheim Ducks Fans!!!!!

For great pictures and local coverage go to: http://www.mightyducks.com
http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/sections/sports/pros/ducks/
http://www.dailynews.com/ducks
http://www.latimes.com/sports/hockey/nhl/ducks/

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Friendship

Through the Internet it would seem that our world has grown smaller; that is, we can find anything it would seem that we can think of almost instantly, but this of course is an illusion.

I came across a story the other day on Foxnews.com describing a “black widow.” This woman played the piety angle in order to secure the fond feelings of good people whom she then proceeded to bilk for thousands of dollars, and it would seem left some bereft of their very life.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,260171,00.html

This type of trangression, at least to this extreme, is rare, and I wondered if they were rare enough that I could go twenty or thirty years without having had any acquaintance with such a real world instance, otherwise only known in soap operas, literature, and movies, and music, and well, so pervasive in art, but seemingly so perverse as to not be admitted in real life as it is lived.

No doubt we have all been acquainted with seeming friends that take advantage and, depending upon the scale of the offense compared to the offset of other pleasures, we dismiss said person from our company, or perhaps deign to indulge their quirks, with but, from time to time, a pique of annoyance or even outright smack down when we feel “they have gone too far.”

Overtime, too I think, friends build boundaries of the acceptable and not-to-be accepted. Inherent in such fence building is a significant granting and accepting of trust: Trust to offend and trust to forgive, and trust to be forgiven and even offended. Is this perhaps the true meaning of Frost’s friend and neighbor “fences make good neighbors.”

Such a state of tension in building a friendship entails no small amount of trial and error, and trial-and-error, you and I both know, is at minimum a vigorous undertaking that is likely far more taxing at the onset than the initially remitted reward, and perhaps, likely? the burden will not be shared equally. This last I think owes to the reason that for many of us our greatest friendships are established early in life, or at the least, serves as valuable instruction when and if new friendships of the meaningful sort are made available later in life. At any rate forged friendships early in life are a blessing; it is a distinct benefit to have company on the road well traveled, or for that matter, on the one less so.

The betrayal Sandra Camille Powers engaged in was worse than tragic, she is no Brutus, and more certainly she does not play in the common comedic plots of betrayal found in Friends or Seinfeld. Hers is an actual betrayal of form. She betrays the very structure of friendship. A Venus flytrap if you will, or those weird fish in Nature films that lure by obfuscation.

Of course such ensnarement depends on a suspension of our natural caution and wariness: self-preservation for most of us is really important: Rightfully so to my thinking.

And the lure that mimics is hinted at in this aphorism found in an essay “Of Friendship” by Montaigne: “And Aristotle says that good legislators have had more care for friendship than for justice.” Without that word “good,” I think we can agree, that little line would be very problematic, but with it, is very promising.

Montaigne idealizes friendship to an extraordinarily exclusionary relationship, if not pure absolutism. As he talks about the blending of souls that we might recognize better as the bond of marriage, we can agree with the affect if though differing with his exactness. Besides he was writing in the late 1500’s, and though raised in the newly emerging humanist idiom, the blending of three into one reality was sharply impressed on all thinking members of society, to such degree I imagine that any expression of understood perfection would express itself in just those terms.

Be that as it may, the point is taken that in our friends, and I would hope in all our families as well, that we feel as much and more joy, in the joy, of our friends, but unfortunately feel as much or more sorrow, in the sorrow, of our friends. Otherwise, we aren’t communicating with friends, but making “associations that are forged and nourished by pleasure or profit, by public or private needs…” These associations I would say are the bread and butter of society and have intrinsic use, but friends says our friend Montaigne, “our free will has no product more properly its own than affections and friendship.”

And of this which we call friendship, in some part lies, as in love, our need to be willing to give advice and instruction when and where asked if it is in our power; and concurrently, be willing to receive advice and instruction as we are then able to receive. Those who share in this are truly friends and truly blessed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

For the Record--Bears Repeating--Distinctions

Clearly there is one group of legal and illegal immigrants that by the simple rote of reason require far more scrutiny (those from the Middle East) than those from all other regions.

Of those who want to come here to improve the lot of themselves and their families, who can blame them? It is after that initial finding that we can blame them for flouting our laws. That is we certainly welcome those from whatever region who genuinely apply themselves legally to immigrating to our country and attendantly desire to be Americans.

Of the former group can they blame us for scrutinizing their motives? speaking of those who inquire as to legal immigration. But of those favoring the illegal route, they deserve no second consideration.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Getting It Right

So what have learned about the illegal immigration bill, a.k.a. the amnesty bill.

A cobbled illegal immigration is necessary because?

There won’t be enough votes to pass it otherwise.

1) There are Border Security votes.

2) There are Route to Citizenship votes.

3) There are we need Labor votes.

Lose any of the aforementioned and it won’t pass. Can’t prioritize because it falls apart if everything isn't all done at once. We have to have everything at one and the same time, in the bill that is, because as we all know there are bench marks. Unh hunh.

"Route" to citizenship: is supported by the open boarder crowd, meaning in particular the Democratic party and other altruistic and dare I say it, cynics who for opposite reasons collide in the hope that they'll reap the benefit of the new voters. Open boarders now and forever: The open border people see this bill as nothing less than another step toward their goal.

And seeing as how people walk and swim faster than we can build a fence, a cobbled amnesty bill will open the flood gates until such time the fence is built, whenever that will be.

Whatever else one says about open borders this much is true: we surrender our sovereignty.

Labor needs: meaning we need cheap labor (serf labor?) or the US economy will collapse. Talk about a scare tactic. St. George Utah, we hear will waste away to a mere dust mote if we don't allow illegal immigrants to build the homes. Poppycock.

When young I tried my hand, at the urging of some friends, to give cement work a go. Hard work that. I confess this was a short lived occupation for myself, but for some of my friends it was not. The point here, is that, there are still many young men who do not jump into college but still prefer the jingle of coins in their pocket to the sound of poverty.

What really is the impact of illegals in the labor market, not just from the point of view of the employer, but also on the employee? In any case I'm not part of the round em up and send them home crowd, but I do think the doom and gloom that life will come to a screeching halt if they left is just a bit over stated.

Anyway, why then can't we provide for a one or two year temporary bump in visas issued for legal aliens to come and work while we study, and note that we would have fresh data, the immigration needs and visa entrance needs of the country?

*********

So to restate, we can't prioritize these disparate considerations because they all have to be legislated simultaneously or the whole endeavor falls off the cliff.

I disagree. Actually, what we know is we have to have the border secured. That is without question. Let's build the whole fence and prepare the other border controls, immigration controls, within a year--fund it.

In the meantime, we can leave well enough alone on those who are already here; some will leave and some won't.

Then at such time as we are ready to process them (illegals), with an administrative infrastructure tested and ready to go, we can have this gargantuan Ells Island moment that the country has weighed in on and agreed to.

That's what I'm thinking anyway.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

As I was saying Eureka is in California

If you have been reading this place, you'll note that I mentioned I wanted to capture the fun fare that California daily offers up. I likewise mentioned that California is a big state. In the spirit of that I have been taking a glimpse from afar at Eureka.

My initial, and firm, reaction is how refreshingly regular Eureka appears to be. I only qualify this assessment because I don't live there.

Now for some, Eureka may be, well where the heck is that? Look on your map, follow the coast line until you reach way up high on the Northern California coast. You'll see that it sits in Humboldt county nestled next to the second largest estuarine embayment in California. The largest? San Francisco Bay.

Like all small to midsize cities, it seems these days, the city and the county to which it belongs is endlessly embroiled in the intense tug-of-war between economic and ecological interests. Questions of how to dredge the bay for example, and where to put said dredge, dredges up heated passions. Then there are questions of lumber, but as you know the drill, and as these are questions that can be entertained another day we'll just pass by.

But a glimpse at Newspapers, two that I found, gives a ticker tape of an additional hue.

From the Times-Standard in an article by Bruce Hamilton: Consider potential market carefully. The article describes an entrepreneurial contest: Economic Fuel - Student Driven Entrepreneurship.

The author writes, and yes he was one of the judges:

"Having read all 32 plans, I will make a few comments. First of all, the spirit of the entrepreneur is alive and well in Humboldt County. The passion and drive to create something new confirmed my belief in the health, strength and vitality of our young people."

http://times-standard.com/business/ci_5887877

“Health, strength, and vitality,” what a refreshing assessment. More please.

From the Oh No department, which surely deserves a Tid Bit moment, demonstrates bureaucratic quagmires are all to ubiquitous as found in an article titled: Narrow Relief.

The gist is that big trucks aren't allowed to carry cattle in and out of Humboldt county.
I had no idea. Why would I.

Good News:

"On the legislative side, the state Senate unanimously passed a provision to allow cattle haulers to use larger trucks to transport cattle in and out of Humboldt County."

As the article further points out, however, the State Assembly has to pass a matching bill and naturally Governor Schwarzenegger has to sign it. I think the Governor will go for it, but the Assembly? Where’s my ouija board.

http://www.times-standard.com/opinion/ci_6019593

I also recommend the Times-Standard http://www.northcoast101.com/week_in_photos/

The Eureka Reporter was the additional paper I canvassed.

Now you can call me hokey, but I think this story on The Bucket Brigade sounds like fun, as reported by Joni Schrantz:

"David Moss, of the Fieldbrook Fire Department, empties a bucket of water into a bin at the Fireman’s Muster, the opening event of the Azalea Festival, Thursday night in the Mill Creek Marketplace in McKinleyville."

http://www.eurekareporter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ArticleID=24629

But then such an event is in keeping with a city where you can have coffee and bagels with the police chief.

http://www.eurekareporter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ArticleID=24626

And though not exactly dealing with Humboldt county, I did stop to take in the culinary insights of all things Bangkok as written by Erica Lee Nelson. Here’s a taste of what she has to say:

“They sneak up on you, at first bite warm, then hot, then building to a crescendo just as you’ve been foolish enough to take another spoonful.”

She’s speaking of rather “flaming red hot chillies.” More here:

http://www.eurekareporter.com/ArticleDisplay.aspx?ArticleID=24620

Oh I'm sure that Eureka and Humboldt county have more than their fair share of foibles--that it seems is universal. Yet enjoying the rhythm of a city of 25,000 nestled between beautiful state and national redwood parks sitting on a bucolic, but also working, bay, is not a bad way to spend an afternoon. Even from afar.

For some basic facts go to: http://encarta.msn.com/encyclopedia_761552086/Eureka_(California).html

For the record I have been there and the one element I could do with a little less is the fog. But on a clear day its a place that has to be seen.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Our President George W. Bush

Just a few a reasons why I admire, esteem, and have great affection for our President George W. Bush.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zsSyNvVM8hg

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1Bl0jWq6yg

And from his speech in Arlington, VA:

"Nothing said today will ease your pain. But each of you needs to know our country thanks you and we embrace you and we will never forget the terrible loss you have suffered."

"The greatest memorial to our fallen troops cannot be found in the words we say or the places we gather," he added. "The more lasting tribute is all around us."

"On this day of memory, we mourn brave citizens who laid their lives down for our freedom," he said. "May we always honor them, may we always embrace them and may we always be faithful to who they were and what they fought for."

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,275852,00.html


President George W. Bush is a most gracious, good, and decent man. God Bless Him.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Morning Tid Bits

 In the interest of compromise Iran and the US held talks over Tea and Bagels, I’m assuming anyway, and we are assured that the first talks in 27 years between the two countries (with not much love lost) centered around the desire to stabilize Iraq. Naturally. Of course. Undoubtedly….

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,276091,00.html

The New York Times, offering a different approach , advocates checkered flag illegal immigration. To there credit, I think, they’re against serfdom.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/29/opinion/29tue1.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

From the flat earth files comes this in an editorial by the LAT…we might some day maybe possibly be underwater. Their proposal, 3 guesses, no not Al Gore’s ponzi carbon credit whatever scheme, and no--who said bicycles? Yea I missed it too, taxes, yes that’s right taxes. It’s your basic two fer.

http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-ed-carbontax28may28,0,2888366.story?coll=la-opinion-center

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Consent of the Governed

There is no joy in opposing something so clearly cared for by those I respect and admire. I would that it were otherwise. But that is not the case. And though it is not the easiest measure, I believe that the means applied should be mete to the purpose and all things gratitituous should be avoided.

With that said, this pablum of an immigration bill is an affront.  

This amnesty bill is a monstrous abomination. Carve it up. Burn it up. Rip it up. Tear it up. Stomp on it. Toss it in the toilet. Destroy it any way you want, but never ever let it see the time of day.

Forget every consideration on National Security, if you must.

Forget every sense of justice for those who live by the rules; specifically, immigrants who immigrate legally, if you must.

Forget the costs you levy on the backs of the American People, if you must.

But do not forget that you are rending the Bill of Rights. Do not forget you are rending the right of Self Determination. Do not forget that you are rending the First Amendment: You are rending the right of Free Assembly: You are rending the right of the people to freely assemble and determine the shape and meaning of our own society; our own culture; our own government.

This one issue at least is beyond the reach, absolutely, by those who would act in our own best interests. You may not define for us who we are. This one policy issue is wholly and completely beyond your purview.

This is not defense policy; this is not energy policy; this is not economic policy; this is the very core of what a citizen of the United States Citizen is. This is not something you can do for us in the name of our own good. In this we are our own good.

Incinerate and cast into the lake of fire this abomination, this thing of instant legality for the lawless, this thing that mocks the very spirit of America.

The Declaration of Independence: "We therefore, the Representatives of the United States of America, in General Congress, Assembled..."

And from whence did they receive their authority but from the assembled nation.

The Bill of Rights: "Congress shall make no law respecting...the right of the people peaceably to assemble..."

And what else can assembly mean at principled breadth but the right to self-determination.

Until you consult with we The American People you are usurping our rightful place as the guardians of our own nation. We are the ones to consult on this issue of this our identity. It is we you must consult on the shape of our nation. It is we who decide who is a citizen; we who decide who we are.

It is we who must decide what to do with a people who have come here flouting the very essence of our purpose: The rule of law made legitimate by the consent of the governed. If you have forgotten the goverened is US.

We are a graceful people, a forgiving people, but when we speak to the honesty of securing our border before all else don't you believe that is your paramount duty? What other entrusted duty could ever be so important? Protetct us as we entrusted you to do and you will find that we are a generous people, or have you forgotten?


 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Memorial Day

Commemorates our fallen heroes. And none should be more gloried with the highest honor our nation can bestow. And though upon them we smile our greatest love and pride, we but have the profoundest sorrow in our hearts. Let us listen wholly and fully, let us bow our heads, to the solemn playing of taps.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive